Another Question Answered, All In A New Moon
Hey, so Anne left a question to my post “Breaking Dawn: Not Really Worth It”: I would love for you to express your point of view on this one. Why is it that every time someone writes a book about vamps they mention Twilight to compare it to?
I ask you this because my Twilight obsess friends burned my copy of my novels that had vampires in it.I feel like one cannot write about vampires because of Meyer any more. ~Anne
My Answer starts with this: Money. Meyer’s books grabbed the attention of a lot of young American readers, and what do young people have a lot of? Disposable income. The media picked up on the buzz that was going around and dollar signs filled their eye sockets. What now? Get some hot young actors for the film version so we can reel in more teen followers, and lets ride this train for as long as we can.
You see Meyer’s book isn’t that great, but it has a lot of fans. DEVOTED fans. Putting her book in the spotlight. This book is in the forefront of everyone’s minds, especially those people who are not usual followers of vampire fiction, suddenly vampires are in vogue right now and a lot of people are just now hopping on the bandwagon. Twilight is their first taste in a genre that has been a round since the late 1800’s. Therefore whenever another book about vamps is talked about or publicized the majority of people reach for Twilight to compare to because its what most people are currently familiar with. For them this vampire thing is a fad, even though authors have been writing about vamps for 150+ years. So that’s why everyone’s using Twilight as a comparison: Everyone knows about it.
An answer to your other question, I do think people can still write about vampires. In fact people are currently publishing books about vampires. Those books may be getting a boost right now thanks to Meyer. Those who are actually interested vampires will use Meyer’s work as a jumping off point to delve deeper into the other vampire stories that are out there and this will keep the genre alive. The same thing sorta happened in the 90’s when Anne Rice’s books were made into a movie. Anyone remember Interview with a Vampire? Movies like Blade, and Underworld also did the same thing. They revive interest in the fascination with vamps. The difference with Meyer is that her book was more youthful, its also simpler and targeted to a wider audience than Rice’s books which are so highly crafted they appeal to a smaller (though still big) group of people and they’re too adult because most media is geared to those between the ages of 13-24 where most of the money is made. If you’ve read or seen Interview then you might understand what I mean. It’s heavy to watch. Brad Pitt’s character is struggling with his vampirism and humanity, he loses everything close to him, and now he has to live forever alone. Its pretty deep stuff, and most 16 year olds don’t want to read 300+ pages or spend 2.5 hours on that. The movie came out when I was really really young, and I didn’t even watch it until last year when my then boyfriend, who was also older than me, made me after I told him I was writing a book with vampires. It’s a good movie, but its not fast paced or fun. It fits in with other standards of the gothic vampire genre like Bram Stoker’s Dracula, which is unique in its style and being the first of many. I think Meyer’s biggest accomplishment was lightening up the genre. She doesn’t add anything to it, but she does make it a little less stuffy and got a lot of young people reading it.
So bottom line is: People can, and should keep writing about vampires if that’s what they really want to do. Thing is this: They shouldn’t expect to be next Meyer (nor should they want to be), instead they should write their story and be true to themselves with it. However, if they do want to stand out then they should be aware that in order to do so they may have to market their work in a unique way. Me, well my book deals with major issues and uses vampires as symbolism for the human condition. Also I don’t make any mention of vampires for a while, hopefully the reader wouldn’t know it had anything to do vamps until way into the novel. Vampires are not the main point you could trade them out for say Werewolves, witches or heck even lepers! I chose vamps for aesthetic reasons. Lastly, I’m not publishing the book in my real name. So anyone I know that picks up the book wouldn’t be able to say: “Hey she said she was writing a book about vampires!” I’m marketing the book as a look at religion, crime, and racism. So obviously I think people can still write about vampires. Now you just have to be careful how you do it.
So last thing since we’re already near the topic. New Moon is coming out November 20, 2009. Super. Can’t you just feel my excitement. (sarcasm). Anyway. I heard a rumor that Gaspard Ulliel a.k.a my one true love, was going to have a part in the movie. I thought: Oh so they’re finally realizing their mistake casting unattractive Robert Pattinson. Instead I heard they were thinking of using him as Alec. First off its false folks. Gaspard knows he’s too much to play opposite Dakota Fanning (who I like a lot, but she’s like 15 and he’s 24…ehhh they’re not really blonde twins either) . Anyway ET put out 15 (really 14 secs) of the trailer. And http://www.newmoonmovie.org put up the vid on YouTube. So Here it is, all rights reserved by Summit:




You Say: